The Financialization of Youth Athletics: Private Equity Consolidation, Public Asset Privatization, and the Crisis of Accessibility in North Texas Soccer
1. Executive Summary
The structural integrity of the United States youth sports ecosystem is currently undergoing a radical transformation, shifting from a community-based, volunteer-driven model to a financialized, capital-intensive industrial complex. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of this paradigm shift, specifically examining the increasing involvement of private equity (PE) firms in local youth soccer facility ownership and club management. By utilizing the North Texas region—specifically McKinney, Dallas, and Frisco—as a primary case study, this document illustrates how the "financialization of childhood" effectively restricts access to Independent School District (ISD) and municipal Park and Recreation facilities.
The research identifies a tripartite mechanism of exclusion driven by "roll-up" strategies employed by institutional investors like 3STEP Sports and Unrivaled Sports. First, market consolidation allows these conglomerates to inflate costs and manufacture artificial scarcity, driving participation fees in elite programs to exceed $15,000 annually. Second, the strategic maneuvering by these "Super Clubs" to secure exclusive usage rights to public infrastructure has effectively privatized assets funded by taxpayer bonds, displacing recreational leagues and local residents. Third, town leadership, motivated by the promise of "sports tourism" revenue, has facilitated this displacement through policy decisions that prioritize regional tournament operators over community cohesion.
Detailed financial analysis of entities such as Solar Soccer Club and Sting Soccer Club, alongside legal reviews of cases like City of McKinney v. KLA International Sports Management, reveals a systemic failure to protect public interests. The result is a segregated system where access to the sport is determined by socioeconomic status rather than athletic potential, creating a "pay-to-play" barrier that threatens the long-term viability of youth soccer as a mechanism for public health and community development.
2. Macroeconomic Context: The Capital Conquest of Childhood Play
To understand the specific restrictions occurring in McKinney, Texas, one must first comprehend the macroeconomic forces reshaping the entire youth sports sector. Historically, youth sports were characterized by fragmentation—a "cottage industry" of thousands of hyper-local, independent clubs, coaching providers, and facility operators. From an investment perspective, this fragmentation represents inefficiency, but also opportunity.
2.1 The Investment Thesis: Arbitrage and Recession Resistance
Private equity firms have identified youth sports as a prime target for consolidation due to a unique convergence of factors. The industry, now valued at over $37.5 billion and projected to reach $69.4 billion by 2030, offers "recession-proof" characteristics.1 Institutional investors characterize parental spending on youth athletics as "emotionally durable".2 Unlike discretionary spending on luxury goods, spending on a child’s athletic development is often viewed by parents as non-discretionary—an essential investment in their child's future educational and social mobility. This psychological leverage point allows firms to maintain or raise prices even during economic downturns, creating predictable, recurring revenue streams that are highly attractive to capital markets.2
The primary strategy employed is the "roll-up" or "buy-and-build." Private equity firms acquire a "platform" company—typically a large, regionally dominant club or event operator—and then aggressively acquire smaller, complementary businesses. By centralizing back-office functions such as procurement, insurance, software, and marketing, the firm achieves economies of scale. More importantly, by consolidating the market, they reduce local competition, granting them the pricing power to increase fees without losing market share.3
2.2 The Major Institutional Players
The landscape is no longer defined by the local "Soccer Dad" or non-profit board, but by multi-billion dollar holding companies.
3STEP Sports: Backed by Juggernaut Capital, 3STEP has executed one of the most aggressive consolidation strategies in the sector. Starting with lacrosse, they have expanded rapidly into soccer, acquiring over 1,800 club teams and managing 2,500 events annually.4 Their model is vertical integration: they own the club the athlete plays for, the tournament the team attends, the facility where the tournament is held, and the media company that films the games.4 This captures the entire "share of wallet" of the sports family.
Unrivaled Sports: Backed by The Chernin Group and led by veterans of Blackstone, Unrivaled Sports manages 15 youth sports brands and has made significant plays in the tournament and facility management space, including the acquisition of the Cooperstown All-Star Village.1 Their entry into the market signals a shift toward "destination" sports—high-cost, travel-heavy experiences that prioritize tourism revenue over local development.
Steel Partners / Steel Sports: A diversified holding company (NYSE: SPLP) that explicitly lists "youth sports" alongside industrial products and banking as a core business segment.6 Steel Sports operates with the explicit goal of bringing corporate efficiency to the "fragmented" coaching and facility market, effectively treating youth coaching as an industrial supply chain management challenge.8
2.3 The "Financial Engineering" of the Sector
Critics argue that this transformation represents the "financial engineering of childhood".3 The operational playbook involves loading acquired companies with debt to fund further acquisitions, extracting management fees, and prioritizing short-term cash flow metrics (EBITDA) over long-term player welfare. This manifests in the "efficiency" of increasing player-to-coach ratios, replacing experienced (expensive) staff with younger (cheaper) contractors, and maximizing facility throughput at the expense of field quality or scheduling convenience for families.3
The implications of this macro-trend are visible in the inflation of valuations for youth sports assets. For example, KKR’s acquisition of Varsity Brands for $4.75 billion and BPEA EQT’s acquisition of IMG Academy for $1.25 billion signal that youth sports assets are now trading at multiples comparable to elite technology or healthcare companies.2 This influx of capital demands a return, and that return is generated by increasing the average revenue per user (ARPU)—in this case, the cost to the parent.
3. The Corporate Architecture of North Texas Soccer
The North Texas region serves as the epicenter of this industrial complex. The demographic profile of the area—affluent suburbs, high disposable income, and a cultural emphasis on competitive achievement—makes it the ideal laboratory for the private equity model. The market here is dominated by "Super Clubs" that function less like community non-profits and more like vertically integrated corporations.
3.1 Solar Soccer Club: The Corporate Non-Profit
Solar Soccer Club exemplifies the modern "Super Club." While organized as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, its operational scale and financial behaviors mirror those of a mid-sized for-profit enterprise.
3.1.1 Financial Scale and Governance
According to recent filings, Solar Soccer Club reported annual revenues of $6.88 million in 2024, with total assets of $5.52 million.9 The club has grown through aggressive mergers, such as the absorption of Mutiny FC, which expanded its roster to over 225 teams and 2,000 players.10 This scale allows Solar to exert significant influence over municipal decisions regarding field allocation, as they can guarantee thousands of booked hours, unlike smaller community clubs.
The governance structure of Solar reflects its corporate ambitions. The board of directors and leadership team includes individuals with backgrounds in commercial real estate, law, and finance rather than just soccer pedagogy. For instance, the partnership with Texas Regional Bank (TRB) is framed as an "investment" in the community, utilizing corporate sponsorship language that emphasizes brand alignment and market presence.11 This commercial partnership model is essential for maintaining the high overhead of a Super Club but fundamentally alters the mission from pure access to brand dominance.
3.1.2 The Commodification of Participation
Solar's fee structure and financial policies reflect a hardening of the "customer" relationship. The club enforces strict "no refund" policies, which necessitates the partnership with third-party insurance providers like USSCI to offer "Sports Fee Protect" insurance.12 This securitization of club dues—treating a child's participation fee as an insurable financial asset—highlight the extent to which the relationship between club and family has been financialized. If a child is injured or loses interest, the family's financial obligation remains, protecting the club's cash flow at the expense of the consumer.
3.2 Sting Soccer Club: Vertical Integration with 3STEP Sports
Sting Soccer Club, a historic all-girls organization, has aggressively expanded its footprint, recently launching a Central Texas division to capture markets in Gonzales, Luling, and Seguin.13 However, the most significant development is its integration into the 3STEP Sports ecosystem.
3.2.1 The 3STEP Ecosystem Effect
While Sting retains its brand identity, its operational capabilities are augmented by 3STEP Sports. Snippet 14 confirms 3STEP's acquisition of EDP Soccer to "increase cooperative initiatives" with clubs. This integration allows Sting to offer "elite" pathways and tournament experiences that independent clubs cannot match, effectively cornering the market on high-level competition. By controlling the "pathway" events—showcases where college scouts are present—3STEP and its affiliate clubs create a closed loop. If a player wants to be seen by scouts, they must play in a 3STEP-managed tournament, often requiring membership in a 3STEP-affiliated club or participation in a league owned by the conglomerate.4
3.2.2 Philanthropy as a loss Leader
Sting operates the Sting Soccer Foundation, a 501(c)(3) entity that reported $471,499 in revenue in 2023.15 While the foundation purports to offer financial aid, the mechanics of this aid reveal the limitations of the model. Aid is often applied only to "club dues" and is distributed at the end of payment plans, meaning families must have the liquidity to pay up-front costs for uniforms and travel.16 Furthermore, the aid rarely covers the significant costs of "Stay-to-Play" travel requirements, meaning the barrier to entry remains prohibitively high for lower-income families despite the existence of the foundation.
3.3 FC Dallas Youth: The Professional Pipeline
FC Dallas Youth represents the apex of the pyramid, where the youth game connects directly to the professional sports entertainment complex. Owned by Hunt Sports LLC, the club monetizes the aspiration of professional play.
3.3.1 Commercial Partnerships and Monetization
FC Dallas has turned its youth academy into a platform for corporate sponsorship. Partnerships with Baylor University (Higher Education Partner) and TOCA Football (training technology) create a commercialized ecosystem around the youth player.17 The integration of TOCA technology into the UMB Bank Performance Center allows for the collection of data on youth players, which can be monetized for scouting or training upsells.18
The "Homegrown Partner Program" further integrates local businesses into this economy, turning the player base into a target demographic for everything from bagels to insurance.19 This transforms the youth club from a training environment into a marketing channel, where the aggregation of affluent families is the product sold to sponsors.
4. The Privatization of Public Infrastructure: A Crisis of The Commons
The most contentious and damaging aspect of this industry's growth is the systematic capture of taxpayer-funded infrastructure. Municipalities and Independent School Districts (ISDs) in North Texas, facing budget constraints and pressure to generate economic activity, are entering into agreements that effectively privatize public parks and school facilities.
4.1 The Mechanism of Capture: "Public-Private Partnerships"
The mechanism is often subtle. A Super Club approaches a city council with a proposal: the club will fund capital improvements (such as converting grass fields to synthetic turf) or guarantee a certain level of rental revenue. In exchange, the city grants the club "exclusive" or "priority" scheduling rights. This transaction, often framed as a win-win for the taxpayer (who gets better fields without immediate tax hikes), results in the long-term alienation of the public from their own land.
4.2 Case Study: The McKinney Soccer Complex at Craig Ranch
The McKinney Soccer Complex at Craig Ranch, a 65-acre facility with 13 fields, serves as a prime example of this trend.20
4.2.1 The Renovation and the Shift to Turf
In 2022, the McKinney City Council authorized a $23.9 million contract with Hellas Construction to renovate the complex, converting natural grass fields to synthetic turf.21 The justification provided in city documents was to "greatly increase the playability of the fields and increase tournament capabilities".20
Analysis: The shift to synthetic turf is a critical pivot point. Turf fields are significantly more expensive to install ($1M+ per field) and require replacement every 8-10 years. To justify this capital expenditure, the city requires high-revenue tenants—specifically, regional tournaments that pay high rental fees—rather than low-revenue local recreational leagues. This creates a structural financial incentive for the city to prioritize commercial use over resident access.
4.2.2 The "Sports Tourism" Imperative
Town leadership has explicitly stated a goal to "market and highlight McKinney as a unique destination".20 By prioritizing tournaments that generate "heads in beds" (hotel occupancy taxes), the city effectively zones the local soccer fields as economic engines for the hospitality industry rather than as recreational amenities for residents.22
Consequently, on weekends—the prime time for local families to use parks—the fields are booked solid by regional tournaments run by third-party operators like Premier International Tours or U90C Sports.23 Local residents, whose property taxes fund the bonds for these parks, find themselves locked out or relegated to inferior "overflow" fields.
4.3 Legal Precedent: City of McKinney v. KLA International Sports Management
The tension between public ownership and private control in McKinney has escalated to litigation, providing a rare window into the legal mechanics of these agreements.
The Case: City of McKinney v. KLA International Sports Management, LLC.25
The Facts: The City entered into a license agreement with KLA, a private sports management company. KLA agreed to improve and maintain the fields (replacing turf) in exchange for a 30-year priority license to use the fields for soccer practice and games.
The Conflict: When the City attempted to terminate the agreement due to alleged defaults, KLA sued. The City attempted to dismiss the suit by claiming "governmental immunity"—the legal doctrine that protects cities from lawsuits when performing governmental functions.
The Ruling: The Dallas Court of Appeals ruled against the City. The court found that because the City was receiving "services" (field maintenance and improvements) from KLA in exchange for the license, the City had waived its immunity under the Texas Local Government Code.
The Implication: This ruling is profound. It establishes that when cities trade field access for capital improvements—a common tactic employed by PE-backed clubs to secure territory—they are entering into binding commercial contracts that strip them of sovereign protections. This makes it incredibly difficult for future city councils to reclaim those fields for public use if the private partner underperforms or excludes local residents. The fields effectively become the property of the private entity for the duration of the lease (in this case, 30 years).
4.4 ISD Facilities: The Fortress of Exclusion
Independent School Districts (ISDs) in Texas control some of the highest-quality athletic real estate in the world, including multi-million dollar stadiums and indoor practice facilities. However, access to these facilities is governed by restrictive policies that favor large, capitalized clubs over community groups.
4.4.1 The "75% Resident" Rule and Priority Tiering
McKinney ISD (MISD) and neighboring districts like New Braunfels ISD utilize a priority tiering system for rentals.
Priority 1: School activities.
Priority 2: Non-profit youth groups comprised of at least 75% district students.27
Priority 3: For-profit or non-resident groups.
Analysis of Exclusion: While the "75% resident" rule appears to favor locals, it is often manipulated. Large Super Clubs can create specific "McKinney" rosters to meet this threshold on paper, granting them access to Tier 2 priority. Smaller, informal neighborhood groups often lack the administrative capacity to verify and document residency to the district's satisfaction. Furthermore, rental policies often prohibit "personal use," preventing informal play and forcing all activity into organized (and monetized) structures.29
4.4.2 Cost Barriers and Insurance Requirements
Even if a local group qualifies for access, the financial barriers are significant. MISD requires organizations to carry $1 million in liability insurance with the district named as an additional insured.28 Additionally, renters must pay for custodial staff ($22+/hour) and site supervisors if the event is outside school hours.30
These costs are negligible for a PE-backed club like Solar or Sting, which spreads insurance costs across thousands of players. However, for a start-up community league or a group of parents wanting to organize a low-cost program, these upfront costs are insurmountable barriers to entry.
4.4.3 "Exclusive Use" Agreements
Some districts, such as New Braunfels ISD, have explicit partnerships with municipalities that grant "exclusive use" of fields to specific youth sports organizations when not in use by the school.29 This creates a monopoly where one organization—often the one with the deepest pockets—becomes the gatekeeper for all youth soccer in the district, effectively outsourcing the management of public assets to a private board.
5. The Economics of "Pay-to-Play": Mechanisms of Extraction
The consolidation of ownership and the privatization of facilities have facilitated a dramatic escalation in the cost of participation. The "pay-to-play" system functions as a regressive tax on athletic development, extracting maximum value from families through a variety of transparent and opaque fees.
5.1 The Cost of Elite Participation
Data analysis of club fee structures in North Texas reveals a tiered pricing model that rapidly escalates.
Recreational Play: The McKinney Soccer Association (MSA) charges approximately $115 per season for recreational play.31 This covers basic fields, volunteer coaches, and referees.
Elite Club Play: In contrast, participation in an ECNL (Elite Clubs National League) program involves a complex stack of fees.
Club Dues: $2,500 - $3,500 annually (covers admin, coaching salaries, field rental).32
Team Fees: $1,500 - $2,500 annually (covers tournament entry fees, coach travel expenses).34
Uniforms: $300 - $500 biennially (mandatory kits from specific vendors).35
Travel: $4,000 - $8,000 annually (flights, hotels, meals for out-of-state showcases).32
Total Estimated Annual Cost: $8,300 - $14,500+ per child.
5.2 The "Stay-to-Play" Racket
One of the most extractive and opaque mechanisms in the modern youth sports economy is the "Stay-to-Play" tournament policy. This policy mandates that for a team to be accepted into a tournament, all players must book their hotel rooms through a specific third-party housing agency designated by the tournament operator.37
The Mechanism:
The Rebate: The housing agency negotiates a block of rooms with local hotels. They might secure a room rate of $159/night.
The Markup: The agency lists the room for families at $189/night.
The Kickback: The $30 difference (the rebate) is split between the housing agency and the tournament operator (e.g., 3STEP, U90C, Premier International Tours).
The Restriction: Parents are strictly prohibited from booking directly with the hotel (even if they find a cheaper rate online), using hotel loyalty points, or staying with relatives. Failure to comply results in the team's disqualification.
Financial Impact: For a large tournament in McKinney with 200 teams, this kickback scheme can generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in "hidden" revenue that is essentially a tax on parents, separate from the visible tournament entry fee.
5.3 The Uniform Monopoly
The consolidation of the market has also impacted the supply chain for equipment. Private equity firm KKR acquired Varsity Brands (which includes BSN Sports) for $4.75 billion.2 Varsity Brands is a dominant distributor of team uniforms.
Super Clubs sign exclusive contracts with brands (Nike, Adidas) through distributors like BSN. These contracts often include "kickbacks" or credit to the club based on the volume of gear parents purchase. This incentivizes clubs to mandate frequent uniform changes (e.g., new kits every two years) and extensive "required" packages (training kits, travel suits, backpacks), forcing families to spend upwards of $500 on gear that is functionally identical to cheaper alternatives.35
5.4 The "Tech Tax"
The modern player is also a digital subscriber. Private equity firms have consolidated the "tech stack" of youth sports.
Video Analysis: Families are often required to split the cost of Veo camera subscriptions to film games for "recruiting" purposes.39
Management Apps: Platforms like TeamSnap (owned by Waud Capital) charge fees for premium features used for scheduling and communication.2
Recruiting Profiles: Players are encouraged to pay for "Featured" profiles on recruiting sites ($299+) to be seen by college coaches.40
6. Socioeconomic Impact and Segregation
The culmination of these economic factors is the rapid socioeconomic segregation of the sport. Youth soccer in North Texas is bifurcating into two distinct and unequal tracks.
6.1 The Widening Chasm
The "Haves": Children from households earning over $100,000 are participating at increasing rates.41 These players have access to professional coaching, year-round turf fields, and the "pathway" to college exposure.
The "Have-Nots": Participation among lower-income families is declining. The "middle class" of soccer—affordable but competitive "Select" leagues—is being hollowed out. Families are forced to choose between low-resource recreational play (MSA) or the high-cost PE-backed ecosystem. There is no middle ground.
6.2 The "ROI" Myth and the College Dream
The entire high-cost ecosystem is marketed on the promise of a Return on Investment (ROI) in the form of college scholarships. Parents justify the $15,000 annual spend as an investment in future tuition.
The Reality: This is a statistical fallacy. The number of full-ride NCAA soccer scholarships is miniscule compared to the number of players. Snippet 1 notes that families often spend far more on youth sports than the value of the potential scholarship. Private equity firms exploit this information asymmetry, selling the hope of a scholarship to thousands of families, while knowing that only a fraction of a percent will achieve it.
6.3 Health Consequences: Burnout as a Business Model
To maximize revenue, the PE business model requires year-round engagement. The "off-season" has been eliminated. Players are pushed into Fall League, Winter Futsal, Spring League, and Summer Camps/Showcases.
Medical Impact: Pediatric sports medicine experts in McKinney warn that this "early specialization" is leading to an epidemic of overuse injuries and burnout among children as young as 12.22 The business need for recurring monthly revenue directly contradicts the physiological need for rest and multi-sport diversity in child development.
7. The Role of Town Leadership and Policy Failures
The transformation of youth soccer in McKinney is not merely a market phenomenon; it is a result of specific policy choices made by town leadership.
7.1 The "Sports Tourism" Trap
McKinney City Council agendas reveal a consistent prioritization of "Destination Sports Parks" over neighborhood amenities.42 By investing $25 million in a complex designed for "tournament capabilities" 20, the city creates a facility that requires non-resident users to be financially viable.
Residents have voiced frustration in public comments regarding traffic, noise, and the commercialization of their neighborhoods.43 However, these concerns are often overridden by the allure of the "economic impact" narrative—the idea that sports families stimulate the local economy. This narrative ignores the "leakage" of that revenue: the hotel profits go to national chains, and the tournament profits go to PE firms like 3STEP, while the local taxpayer bears the burden of bond repayment and traffic congestion.
7.2 The Gift of Public Funds Debate
The City of McKinney v. KLA case highlights a deeper ethical and legal issue. When a city grants exclusive control of public land to a private entity for a nominal fee (in exchange for maintenance), is it violating the state constitution's prohibition on the "gift of public funds"?
While the courts ruled that the "services" provided by KLA constituted valid consideration 25, the practical result is that a public asset is removed from the public domain. The "public" that benefits is not the general citizenry of McKinney, but a specific subset of fee-paying customers (often non-residents).
8. Conclusion
The landscape of youth soccer in North Texas has been fundamentally altered by the influx of private equity capital. What was once a community endeavor, rooted in volunteerism and broad access, has been re-engineered into an extractive industry designed to maximize yield per player.
The mechanisms of this transformation are clear:
Consolidation: The roll-up of clubs and events by giants like 3STEP Sports eliminates competition and inflates prices.
Privatization: The capture of public facilities through "public-private partnerships" and exclusive use agreements locks out the community and privatizes taxpayer assets.
Financialization: The proliferation of fees, from "Stay-to-Play" kickbacks to mandatory insurance, extracts wealth from families at every touchpoint.
Town leadership in McKinney and surrounding areas has been complicit in this shift, seduced by the promises of facility upgrades and tourism revenue. In doing so, they have failed to protect the public interest, allowing the "commons" of youth play to be enclosed by corporate interests.
As costs continue to rise and the demographic base of the sport narrows, the long-term sustainability of this model is questionable. The "financialization of childhood" may generate short-term returns for private equity investors, but it risks hollowing out the sport itself, turning youth soccer into a luxury good accessible only to the affluent, while the community fields built with public money sit behind locked gates, reserved for the next exclusive tournament.
Works cited
The Youth Sports Industrial Complex: And Why Private Equity is ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://profluence.com/youth-sports-industrial-complex-and-private-equity/
How Youth Sports Became a Magnet for Private Equity - Stout, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.stout.com/en/insights/article/youth-sports-became-magnet-private-equity
How Private Equity is Weaponizing Youth Sports, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://nomoredrills.substack.com/p/the-financial-engineering-of-childhood
Little League, Big Money: PE's Push into Youth Sports, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.penewsletter.com/p/little-league-big-money-pe-s-push-into-youth-sports
Private Equity's New Venture: Youth Sports - Jacobin, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://jacobin.com/2025/11/youth-sports-hockey-private-equity
steel partners holdings lp - SEC.gov, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1452857/000145285719000006/splp1231201810k.htm
STEEL PARTNERS HOLDINGS L.P. - deBanked, accessed on January 9, 2026, http://debanked.com/splp10k.pdf
STEEL PARTNERS HOLDINGS L.P._LTR_2020_V1, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://materials.proxyvote.com/Approved/85814R/20200319/STKLT_423516.PDF
Solar Soccer Club - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/752542947
Texas youth soccer clubs Solar SC, Mutiny FC announce merger, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.soccerwire.com/news/texas-youth-soccer-clubs-solar-sc-mutiny-fc-announce-merger/
Texas Regional Bank Announces Sponsorship of Solar Soccer Club, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://trb.bank/news/trb-solar-soccer-club-partnership/
Manager Resources - Solar Soccer Club, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://solarsoccerclub.net/resource-hub/manager-resources/
STING SOCCER CLUB EXPANDS WITH LAUNCH OF STING ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://stingsoccer.com/blog/2025/03/26/sting-soccer-club-expands-with-launch-of-sting-central-texas/
3STEP Sports Acquires EDP Soccer, Becoming the Largest Owner ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20231213611410/en/3STEP-Sports-Acquires-EDP-Soccer-Becoming-the-Largest-Owner-Operator-of-Youth-Soccer-Leagues-in-the-United-States
Sting Soccer Foundation | Addison, TX | Cause IQ, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/sting-soccer-foundation,261463492/
Financial Aid - Sting Soccer Foundation, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://stingsoccerfoundation.org/financial-aid/
Baylor University Announces Exclusive Higher Education ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://bn.web.baylor.edu/news/story/2024/baylor-university-announces-exclusive-higher-education-partnership-fc-dallas
TOCA and FC Dallas Youth Announce Player Development ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.tocafootball.com/journal-post/toca-and-fc-dallas-youth-announce-player-development-partnership
FC Dallas Opens Applications for 2025 Homegrown Partner Program, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.fcdallas.com/news/fc-dallas-opens-applications-for-2025-homegrown-partner-program
CITY OF McKINNEY, TEXAS - File #: 22-0614, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://mckinney.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?m=l&id=24099
CITY OF McKINNEY, TEXAS - File #: 22-0918, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://mckinney.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5861566&GUID=3BD49B58-9F65-4F70-8DAD-6EA8C6DB0688
Youth sports soar: McKinney officials, business owners adapt to ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://communityimpact.com/dallas-fort-worth/mckinney/business/2025/01/31/youth-sports-soar-mckinney-officials-business-owners-adapt-to-meet-rising-demand-for-local-youth-sports/
ABOUT US – International Girls Cup Texas, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://internationalgirlscuptexas.com/about-us/
International Girls Cup of McKinney, TX, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://internationalgirlscuptexas.com/
Dallas Court of Appeals holds City waived immunity in lease ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://rshlawfirm.com/2021/02/05/dallas-court-of-appeals-holds-city-waived-immunity-in-lease-agreement-for-use-of-soccer-fields-in-exchange-for-upgrades-and-maintenance/
CITY OF MCKINNEY v. KLA INTERNATIONAL SPORTS ... - Studicata, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.studicata.com/summaries/court-of-appeals-of-texas/city-of-mckinney-v-kla-international-sports-management-2021-reuv6h/
Facility Rentals - McKinney ISD, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.mckinneyisd.net/page/facility-rentals
McKinney ISD Community Use of District Facilities Management ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://files-backend.assets.thrillshare.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/4789/Misd/8e593228-79d9-4958-827a-f9435784c0b6/Facilities_Leasing_Use_Guidelines_updated_2024.pdf?disposition=inline
FACILITY USAGE GUIDELINES - New Braunfels - NBISD, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://nbisd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Facility-Usage-Guidelines-240715.pdf
Policy #902 USE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES AND ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://home.isd1.org/uploads/1/2/5/6/12568878/902_use_of_district_facilities__1_.pdf
McKinney Soccer Association, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://mckinneysoccer.org/
ECNL - Anyone care to reveal how much money it cost?, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://gasoccerforum.com/thread/2944/ecnl-care-reveal-money-cost
2025-26 Richmond United Travel Soccer Fees, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://richmondunited.com/2025-26-richmond-united-travel-soccer-fees/
Solar Soccer Club Fees - Oreate AI Blog, accessed on January 9, 2026, http://oreateai.com/blog/solar-soccer-club-fees/55bc17bbdb9f8b744e65f7ca73e56f6f
The Cost Crisis in Youth Soccer: How Pay-to-Play is Reshaping ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://admiral-sports.com/shop/usa_en/journal/the-cost-crisis-in-youth-soccer-how-pay-to-play-is-reshaping-american-talent-development-and-limiting-participation/
ECNL Girls Fee Structure - Phoenix Rising Youth Soccer, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.prfcyouthsoccer.com/elite-platforms/ecnl/fees/
Private Equity's New Venture: Youth Sports | Hacker News, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46006183
2026 NTX Celtic SnowBall Cup, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.ntxceltictournaments.com/Default.aspx?tabid=992699
ECNL / ECNL-RL fees : r/bootroom - Reddit, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/bootroom/comments/1e44a8h/ecnl_ecnlrl_fees/
Solar Soccer Club Home | SoccerWire .com, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://www.soccerwire.com/club/solar-sc/
Project Play survey: Family spending on youth sports rises 46% over ..., accessed on January 9, 2026, https://projectplay.org/news/2025/2/24/project-play-survey-family-spending-on-youth-sports-rises-46-over-five-years
Dec 02, 2025 City Council Work Session - McKinney, TX, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://mckinneytx.new.swagit.com/videos/362420?ts=1568
Oct 15, 2024 City Council Work Session - McKinney, TX, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://mckinneytx.new.swagit.com/videos/317691?place=holder&Mode2=Video
Apr 16, 2024 City Council Regular Meeting - McKinney, TX, accessed on January 9, 2026, https://mckinneytx.new.swagit.com/videos/302898?place=holder&start=2305&Mode2=Video
