The Non-Profit Illusion: How North Texas Youth Soccer Clubs Enrich Executives and Fail Families

Listen to the article -> HERE

In the sprawling suburbs of North Texas, youth soccer is not just a pastime; it is a high-stakes industry. Every weekend, thousands of families flock to immaculately manicured fields in Plano, Frisco, and Allen, their SUVs loaded with gear that costs hundreds of dollars, paying club fees that rival college tuition. The organizations running these leagues—giants like Solar Soccer Club, the Dallas Texans, and Sting Soccer—often bear the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt designation. Legally, they are charities, existing in the same tax category as food banks and homeless shelters.

However, a deep forensic analysis of financial filings and court records reveals a stark disconnect between this charitable status and the commercial reality. While these clubs enjoy massive tax breaks intended to foster community access, the benefits rarely trickle down to the families writing the checks. Instead, the "non-profit" label has become a shield for a business model that facilitates executive enrichment, aggressive asset accumulation, and, in some cases, systemic fraud.

The Broken Promise: Why Tax Breaks Don't Lower Fees

The fundamental social contract of a non-profit is simple: the government waives taxes so the organization can use that surplus to serve the public. In youth soccer, this should translate to subsidized fees and broad access for low-income players. In North Texas, it largely does not.

The first misconception many parents have is that their thousands of dollars in "club dues" are tax-deductible. They are not. Because the IRS views these payments as a "quid pro quo"—money paid for services rendered—families pay with after-tax dollars.1 Meanwhile, the clubs themselves are exempt from federal income tax, state franchise tax, and, crucially, the 8.25% Texas sales tax.

For a club like Solar SC, which generates nearly $7 million in annual revenue, the sales tax exemption on equipment, field maintenance, and facilities saves hundreds of thousands of dollars annually.2 Yet, parent fees continue to rise. These savings are not passed on as fee reductions; they are absorbed into the operating budget, often to fund higher salaries and facility expansion. The tax burden is effectively shifted entirely to the families, who subsidize the club's tax-free existence while receiving no fiscal relief themselves.

The "Ghost" Salaries and Executive Enrichment

One of the most contentious aspects of this "charitable" ecosystem is how executive compensation is handled. While managing a multi-million dollar organization requires talent, the pay scales in North Texas youth soccer often eclipse those of the community workforce the clubs claim to serve.

The Transparent Excess

Analysis of IRS filings for Solar Soccer Club reveals a compensation structure that mirrors the corporate world rather than the charitable sector. Executive Director Adrian Solca has received reportable compensation packages reaching $300,000.4 To put this in perspective, the average annual salary for a worker in the Dallas-Fort Worth area is approximately $68,400. The leader of a youth sports charity is earning more than 4.4 times the average worker in his community.

The Shell Game

Other clubs appear to use more opaque methods. Organizations like the Dallas Texans and Sting Soccer have historically reported $0 compensation for their top principals on their non-profit Form 990s.5 This does not mean these leaders work for free. It often suggests the existence of parallel for-profit entities—such as "Sting Soccer Group, LP"—that charge the non-profit "management fees" or "licensing fees." This legal sleight-of-hand allows executives to extract tax-exempt revenue from the non-profit side and move it into a private business where salaries are hidden from public scrutiny, effectively bypassing the transparency required of 501(c)(3) organizations.

The Kickback Economy: Monetizing the Uniform

Perhaps the most egregious example of exploiting families is the mandatory uniform cycle. Clubs sign exclusive contracts with manufacturers like Nike, Adidas, or Capelli. In exchange for mandating that every player buy a specific kit—often costing between $300 and $500—the clubs receive "rebates."

These rebates are essentially legalized kickbacks. Instead of using their bulk purchasing power to negotiate lower prices for families (e.g., getting a $50 jersey for $30), non-profit clubs often agree to the full retail price for parents. In return, the manufacturer kicks back a percentage of that spend to the club as cash or credit.7 Families are effectively forced to make a hidden donation to the club every time they buy a pair of socks, while club leadership frames the exclusive gear deal as a mark of prestige.

A History of Fraud: When the System Breaks

The combination of high cash flow, volunteer governance, and a lack of rigorous external auditing has made North Texas youth soccer a fertile ground for financial malfeasance. The history of the region is dotted with cases where the "charitable" mission was hijacked for personal gain.

• The Solar SC Embezzlement: In a scandal that shook the local soccer community, David Ringer, the long-time President of Solar Soccer Club, was indicted and pleaded guilty to misapplication of fiduciary property. He siphoned approximately $800,000 from the club over several years, using player fees to cover personal debts and fund his law firm. The fraud went undetected for years because Ringer held a position of absolute trust with little oversight.9

• Sting Soccer’s "Fiscal Shortages": Brent Coralli, the owner of Sting Soccer, was involved in a massive illegal gambling ring for which he pleaded guilty. Separately, he faced a civil lawsuit alleging securities fraud, where an investor claimed that funds intended for a mobile lottery business in Peru were instead diverted to "fund fiscal shortages in the sports world of Sting." While the securities fraud claim was eventually dismissed, the allegations highlighted the dangerous commingling of youth sports funds with risky private ventures.11

• The Wylie Youth Soccer Theft: As recently as May 2025, the treasurer of the Wylie Youth Soccer Association was arrested for stealing over $300,000. Like the Solar case, this involved a trusted insider treating the club's bank account as a personal piggy bank, exploiting the lack of third-party audits common in youth sports non-profits.

Conclusion: A Cycle Destined to Repeat

The "non-profit" status of elite youth soccer clubs in North Texas is, for all practical purposes, a tax shelter for commercial entertainment businesses. By utilizing 501(c)(3) designations, these clubs avoid taxes, gain priority access to municipal fields, and solicit donations, all while charging exorbitant fees that exclude the very public they are chartered to serve.

More disturbingly, the structural vulnerabilities that allowed David Ringer and others to embezzle millions remain largely unaddressed. As long as these organizations are run by self-perpetuating boards with minimal transparency and no requirement for independent forensic audits, the "pay-to-play" model will continue to be a target for fraud.

The parents of North Texas are not just paying for coaching and fields; they are unwittingly capitalizing an unregulated banking system for club executives. Until the IRS and governing bodies enforce stricter "public benefit" requirements and financial controls, the story of fraud in youth soccer is not a matter of history—it is a preview of the next scandal.

Works cited

1. Are soccer fees/expenses tax deductible if the club is registered as a ..., accessed on December 25, 2025, https://socalsoccer.com/threads/are-soccer-fees-expenses-tax-deductible-if-the-club-is-registered-as-a-non-profit.21593/

2. Solar Soccer Club - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica, accessed on December 25, 2025, https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/752542947

3. Solar Soccer Club | Allen, TX - Cause IQ, accessed on December 25, 2025, https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/solar-soccer-club,752542947/

4. Reviews of Solar Soccer Club, CEO Salary, Legit, Mission, 990 and ..., accessed on December 25, 2025, https://givefreely.com/charity-directory/nonprofit/ein-752542947/

5. Dallas Texans Soccer Club | Plano, TX - Cause IQ, accessed on December 25, 2025, https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/club-soccer,201652302/

6. Reviews of Sting Soccer Foundation, CEO Salary, Legit, Mission ..., accessed on December 25, 2025, https://givefreely.com/charity-directory/nonprofit/ein-261463492/

7. Parents are being robbed even for uniforms cost. : r/youthsoccer, accessed on December 25, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/youthsoccer/comments/1l7g3xf/parents_are_being_robbed_even_for_uniforms_cost/

8. The Cost Crisis in Youth Soccer: How Pay-to-Play is Reshaping ..., accessed on December 25, 2025, https://admiral-sports.com/shop/usa_en/journal/the-cost-crisis-in-youth-soccer-how-pay-to-play-is-reshaping-american-talent-development-and-limiting-participation/

9. Keep Thieves From Stealing From Your Nonprofit Youth Sports ..., accessed on December 25, 2025, https://www.mjcpa.com/keep-thieves-from-stealing-from-your-nonprofit-youth-sports-league/

10. Keep thieves from stealing from your nonprofit youth sports league, accessed on December 25, 2025, https://mordfin.com/blog/keep-thieves-from-stealing-from-your-nonprofit-youth-sports-league-2/

11. In Re: Sting Soccer Group, LP, and Brent Lee Coralli Appeal from ..., accessed on December 25, 2025, https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fifth-court-of-appeals/2017/05-17-00317-cv.html

12. Texas Soccer Foundation v. Sting Soccer Foundation Appeal from ..., accessed on December 25, 2025, https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fifth-court-of-appeals/2021/05-19-01228-cv.html